Geronimo Stilton – Taking Stereotypes to New Depths
If you are a parent of a child aged anywhere from seven to ten years old, you have likely heard of Geronimo Stilton. This book series is marketed to Canadian children through the Scholastic book flyers that come home from school several times a year.
I have had many reservations about this series. For starters, there is the character of Geronimo. He is the bookish and sensitive male editor of a big-city newspaper, scared of his own shadow, and very clumsy. He is often reduced to tears and his constant crying is depicted as ridiculous, not as a legitimate emotional response. He is teased by his cousin, harassed by his grandfather, and shown up regularly by his sister. And, for the record, he never gets the girl. In other words, he is the quintessential nerd.
And then there are the women. In addition to silly names – like Petunia Prettypaws, Pinky Pick, Mousita, Priscilla Prettywhiskers, and Aunt Sweetfur – almost all have long and wavy hair, long eyelashes, tiny waists, and protruding chests that are emphasized by their cover girl poses. They often wear pink, and many sport bare midriffs, revealing gowns or short dresses or shorts. Women who are intended as villains or nuisance characters – like Tina Spicytail and Sally Ratmousen – are overweight and overbearing. They screech and yell and generally act very “unladylike”.
While previously available only as paperbacks, the series’ authors have ventured into what I imagine is the more lucrative hardcover market with longer stories aimed at an older audience. One recent example is The Kingdom of Fantasy, released in 2009.
I will confess that I have not yet read the entire book, but the character descriptions at the start do not give me much hope. There is Princess Scatterbrain, a pink dragon, who is described as “a bit on the ditzy side”. Cozy is the Queen of the Gnomes. She is “an excellent cook, an expert gardener, and the one who rules the household.” (Couldn’t let her rule the kingdom now could we.) The character of Factual – note the name – is the “wise and kind King of the Gnomes”. Factual loves to read, loves science, and is always cheerful. Another character described as wise is a female turtle, although unlike King Factual, her name does not imply wisdom – she is simply called Shelly. She appears to contrast with the king in another way. Where he is cheerful and kind, she is known for having a “hard shell” while being all heart inside.
I must admit that I am being a tad hypocritical about these books. I have let my son read most of them, although I counter them with books that include balanced gender portrayals, like the Magic Tree House. Yet I have to wonder how Scholastic gets away with publishing stuff like this. Calling a female ditzy? Depicting a male who is smart and literate as a total loser? (The smart guy as geek is an all too common stereotype in kids’ pop culture I’m afraid.)
Where I used to grin and bear this series, I am not sure I can take any more of it. I will read the book first, to see how these characters are portrayed throughout. If they are as bad as I think they’ll be, I will discuss the content with my son and then gently nudge him in another direction the next time he visits the library or takes a trip to the book store.


Thanks for the post, as a fan it gives me something to think about.
I think Thea is quite a strong female character, her appearance is not exactly typical either, and her own series of books also show a varying range of female characters. Petunia Paws is also an uncommon mix of femme appearance with a strong brave side.
Its true Geronimo bears the brunt of his family’s issues but he always demonstrates bravery, a strong sense of ethics and is loyal and honourable with those he knows and also with people in trouble who he can help. If he was such a spineless mouse there would be no story. By the end of each book (particularly the later books) readers see another side to his character.
I’d recommend Race Across America, Mouse Island Marathon among others.
There is alot to be happy with in the series, despite certain obvious stereotypes you discuss, there are moments that allow the characters to demonstrate traits that transcend their initial appearance.
Thanks again for the opportunity to discuss.
Inger
Thanks so much for your feedback!
Yes, Geronimo is certainly loyal and honourable. He also possesses a strong work ethic. But looking at various media aimed at children – TV, film and books – the “smart guy as loser” is a consistent theme. My concern is repeated exposure to such negative ideas across all media. Geronimo aids and abets the wimp imperative more than he combats it, in my opinion, but you have certainly given me another perspective. I should concede that he does stand out by being the protagonist, and not just a nerdy sidekick to some strong, manly man.
I’m not sure I’ve seen a lot of bravery. I see self-doubt, with circumstances forcing him to take on challenges he might not otherwise. I have read Race Across America and it was better than most. I will look for the other and give it a read too.
As far as Thea, she is adventurous, but she is unencumbered by the need to hold down a real job. It seems she doesn’t have as much responsibility as Geronimo. Of course, that is nitpicking. Most kids wouldn’t realize this and would just identify her as a reporter. I have read one of the Thea Stilton books and I wasn’t terribly impressed with the girls. They were okay, but certainly not trailblazers as far as gender roles.
As I said, I have not yet read Kingdom of Fantasy, but I certainly intend to do so soon to see if the content changes my initial vibe about the book, which seems to hew to common stereotypes.
Thanks again.